Re: Time clocks

Icebound <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Craig Powers wrote:
> > Icebound <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>(I personally think that they are stumbling over the wrong technology
> >>but that's just my opionion.)
> >>
> >>You've got all winter to come up with an alternate technology :-)
> >>
> >>Give them some competition.
> > I wonder why they didn't just use electronic eyes?  As far as I know,
> > those are already in use for similar purpose for bowling foul line
> > sensors.  Picking up whether the hand is still gripping the rock is
> > trickier, but the magnetic sensor didn't address that anyway.
> 
> Tricky, because the sweepers and the thrower get in the way.

The sweepers was the key item that I forgot about. :o