
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Sailesh Krishnamurthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> "SK" == Shripathi Kamath <s h r i p a t h i k a m a t h @ h o t m a i l . c o m> writes: > > > SK> I am surprised too, and therefore must stand corrected then. > SK> Can you point me where he said that for Karthik, which I seem > SK> to have missed? > > Sorry, I'm not a googlehunter. > > However, irrespective of the whole debate, which I only skimmed, one > of the few things I do remember is Govandi claiming that Kartik had > hitherto only 3 day games and needs 4/5 day games to display his > potential. > Fair enough. I definitely misunderstood what he said then. Because when he says "Give a spinner a 4th day & 5th day. Then lets decide whether he has the potential to run through a side in tests.", it seems reasonable. A spinner against and in Australia may not even get that opportunity, but at least he is proposing a measurable criterion. > Of course, I might well be loony, as so many of my friends repeatedly > assure me .. given that I'm going all the way to see 3 days of the SCG > test :-) > 3 days of cricket between India and one of the best ever sides in history is something not many will get a chance in their lifetimes. So enjoy it dude. If you get a chance, yell "GILLY'S a WUSS" for me. :-) -- Shripathi Kamath
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |