
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:38:19 -0800, "Charles Beauchamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >I will point out that the perrenial position that you take regarding >Evander >> >Holyfield (you generally knock his level of competition) kind of refutes >> >your strange evaluation of Cooney. >> >> Not at all. I regard Holyfield as one of the best of the 90s, just not >> as good as Lennox Lewis. And from an all time perspective I do not >> consider either Holyfield or Cooney all time greats. I would place >> Holyfield in the lower half of the top 20 of all time-on a par with >> Ken Norton (certainly not in the top 5 that I have seen him placed by >> some) and Cooney somewhere in the top 35 along with Earnie Shavers. >> > >OK I apologize for my misunderstanding of your dozens of Holyfield only >fought old stiffs flavored posts in replies to my dozens of messages to the >contrary over the last 2 years. Somehow I missed your point in all of those >messages slamming Evander's level of competition...that in fact Evander was >an all time top 20 HW. Frankly I think I have always made it clear that >Lennox overall is a greater HW all time... What I have said about Holyfield, I have also said about Marciano. He is over rated due to his looking good against has beens and never weres. And when I have said it, it was always in the context of people either saying that he was a top 10 fighter of all time, or the premier fighter of the 90s. He was neither. Loki
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |