
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Patrick Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 43fan wrote: > > > ... if the Joss say has less squirt than the McD > > or Viking, could it be that more squirt actually masks a bad stroke? > > If the Pivot Point is closer to your bridge length (more squirt), then > yes, it could mask some stroke errors. We've talked here a number of > times about the idea that break cues maybe should have short Pivot > Points (high squirt) for that reason: because your stroke on the break > is probably less reliable than on softer shots, and higher squirt can > help to compensate for your stroke errors. Of course (you probably > heard this comment coming), I wouldn't recommend a higher squirt cue for > playing -- I'd recommend getting a better stroke. Pat, Thanks. It just seemed to make sense, since like I said, I didn't feel like I was doing anything different with my stroke than I'd ever done. Of course I guess that doesn't mean that I absolutely wasn't, but... When I really concentrated on the stroke itself, that's when it "felt" different. Who knows though, maybe I'd just gotten into some bad habits. Either way I agree... having a better stroke is the way to go, and, if it turns out that the Joss is what ended up showing the flaws in my stroke, then I'm even happier that I bought it. :) I'll kind of liken it to golf... I'd love to one day have a swing good enough to really be able to use blades. :) > > Pat Johnson > Chicago >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |