Re: The difficulty of achieving parity with Tennessee, Connecticut

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, warren
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, cb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Did you even think before you wrote that comment? Don't you think you're
> > being a bit naive when you say that after UCONN and TN get their players,
> > there are enough good players for other schools so that they can be
> > competitive? 
> 
> Sure. Look at how their players are ranked. Didn't Duke get the #1
> freshman class (based on Blue Star et al) last year and somebody else
> (besides UCONN and TN) this year? UCONN has only two seniors this year
> and one of them was among the players (coming out of high school) in
> the rankings of 30-50th best. So what happened to the schools that got
> the "best" incoming class of freshmen 4 years ago or 3 years ago? Were
> they "competitive" last year or will they be this year?
> 
> -WG

Look here for additional enlightenment about the strength of incoming
groups of players.
http://www.bluestarbb.com/blue50.htm

In order starting with this year...
CT:4, TN:1
CT:4, TN:17
CT:1, TN:3
CT:not in top 20, TN:1
CT:1, TN:2
CT:10, TN 1

-WG