Re: The difficulty of achieving parity with Tennessee, Connecticut

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, cb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Did you even think before you wrote that comment? Don't you think you're
> being a bit naive when you say that after UCONN and TN get their players,
> there are enough good players for other schools so that they can be
> competitive? 

Sure. Look at how their players are ranked. Didn't Duke get the #1
freshman class (based on Blue Star et al) last year and somebody else
(besides UCONN and TN) this year? UCONN has only two seniors this year
and one of them was among the players (coming out of high school) in
the rankings of 30-50th best. So what happened to the schools that got
the "best" incoming class of freshmen 4 years ago or 3 years ago? Were
they "competitive" last year or will they be this year?

-WG