
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
>Now, I'm not a >NASCAR fan by any means, however, when I look on tv, I see that NASCAR has >no problem filling the stands. If this survey were taken in the >Southeastern US, no way NASCAR would be there. Nascar is a VERY polarizing topic. And yes, it's also somewhat regional. Considering myself as living at the extreme southern end of the North Eastern section of the country, I ally myself more with the "North East" component and less with the "southern end" part. ...Meaning, I personally detest NASCAR. It's an activity, not a sport. At least, by my definition. To qualify as a sport, the human participants must be doing most of the work. So, car racing is not a sport as the cars are doing most of the work. Same for horse racing. The area I live in -- with regard to NASCAR (and other "southern" things, like country music) -- is in a region where North and South bump into each other and both lifestyles are very much in evidence. People here either love NASCAR or despise it. It also becomes a convenient litmus test for developing new friendships. How a person answers the question, "Do you like NASCAR?" generally says a lot about that person. Personally, I think it's a good thing that different regions of the country have different interests. Especially in today's world where so much of the country has become McDonald-ized. Just to pre-emptorily stop someone from posting that NASCAR is alive and well throughout ALL of America -- yes, it indeed has a following "from sea to shining sea". My point is that it is followed to a more intense degree and by a greater proportion of the populace below the Mason-Dixon line than above it. Even women's basketball has regional "pockets" of interest. Beside the State of Connecticut, there's the well-known swath that basically covers the SEC and extends up into Kentucky and Indiana. Jim
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |