Re: Laker Haters: Best of

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
igor eduardo küpfer  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Accordingly, whatever I happen to think of the Lakers as a whole (which is not
>much) shouldn't affect my appraisal of their ability. If I predict doom for
>the franchise, believe me, it's not based on emotions. To call me a hater
>ignores my reasoning.

But if you do turn out to be wrong and the Lakers have a good season,
and it's not due to emotional bias on your part, then would that not
be damning evidence of ineptitude instead?  I'm not sure that's a better
option.  I'd stick with, "hater," if I were you.  ;)


Max
--