
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 3 Dec 2003 13:43:35 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (simy1) wrote: ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> Ima Pseudonym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> : On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:36:06 +0000 (UTC), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> : wrote: >> >> :>Note that this has been one of Brian Sabean's key strategies: he basically >> :>uses all his high draft picks on arms, and then packages them to get >> :>useful stuff. >> :> >> :>It's such a good strategy that Sabean's made it work despite having pretty >> :>miserable talent judgement. >> >> : Well, at least it works when what you're building around is one of the >> : best players in history at his peak. I'll be curious to see how it >> : works after Bonds is gone. >> >> I don't think that's fair to Sabean; the obvious retort is to check out >> how the Texas Rangers are doing. >> > >Not comparable. Arod costs 10M more per season and delivers 3 to 4 >wins less, also per season. Also not comparable since the Rangers' short term moves since signing ARod have been almost uniformly bad. To say that Sabean's strategy is better than another strategy that has been ineptly applied is not saying very much. Otoh, the Rangers are developing a core of young players the likes of which the Giants won't have when Bonds retires.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |