
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
My league has had a few very wild finishes. 1 year, a guy won because of Randy Johnson going that extra monday game after the season. Another, 1 team was 1 rbi short of winning it all and he did not make a move with 2 weeks to go because he did not think he needed to. The year I won (I think 2000), going to the last day, I would have lost if in the last game of the season, Seattle's Brian Hunter got 1 SB and he was running like mental the last 2 weeks of that year. He did not. This year, first and 2nd place are changing daily. I would say 1/2 the time, our league has an exciting finish and the other half, it's not. "Pete Rauske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > giantforever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Roto leagues are anti climatic, like NASCAR. > > I didn't know roto and NASCAR hated weather! > > But seriously...as Ben mentions in his response, roto leagues can have > finishes as intense and furious as any other format; the difference is > simply that those finishes can be much more complicated to follow. In my > own league, last year's final day featured a tight four-way race for > second in which the standings shifted several times throughout the day. An > even better finish in our league was in 1997, as described by John Hunt: > > http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/bbw/sbbw8313.htm > > (well, not that much better for me--I'm the one who was stuck in 3rd.) > -- > Pete Rauske | "Science is my pie. Curiosity is my sweet tooth. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Knowledge is my candy."
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |