
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Ben Edelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I haven't forgotten how my once-lofty predictions for Morgan Ensberg fell > flat in 2002. However, I'd like to note that my predictions for 2002 > (.280/26/90) are almost dead-on for 2003 (.283/21/55 so far). Plus he's also 28. > > So I was almost right; just off by one year :-) > > Of course, I also thought Beltre was going to be a stud. .817 OPS post all star break consistant with what he did last year. At the age of 24 he's more likely to be a better player than Ensberg. Besides the obvious 3B of Blalock and Teixeira would you pick Ensberg(28) over Beltre(24), Hinske(26), Crede(25) or Burroughs(23)? My choices in order would be Burroughs, Crede, Beltre, Hinske, Ensberg > > --Ben
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |