Re: SB 193 and impact on college baseball

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 20:33:23 GMT, "David Negrette"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"Boyd Nation" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 15:58:48 -0500, Rick R. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>> There's apparently a good deal of discussion at the other UC and Cal State
>> schools to try and move up (which could be interesting, since CS-Hayward,
>> CS-Dominguez Hills, and CSLA could all be competitive fairly quickly).
>This
>> has the potential to iron out a lot of the RPI's inherent problems.
>
>
>If California senate bill 193 passes the state assembly next year, there'll
>be no California schools in the NCAA at all. It's a cause for grave concern
>out here in the West:
[snip]
>At least Fullerton and Stanford won't have to gripe about the RPIs anymore.

Reading this article got me to wondering. Clearly the state
government can prevent state schools from belonging to the
NCAA.  However, I wonder whether they can make it stick to
private universities (Stanford and USC come to mind).  I'm
no lawyer, but this sounds to me like something that could
be legally challenged as infringing on a private
association's right of association. - Tony

-- 
Tony Lima                        /"\   ASCII ribbon campaign 
                                 \ /   against HTML mail
                                  X    and postings 
                                 / \