
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: hard landing incident
- __From__: chuck
- __Subject__: Re: hard landing incident
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 07:58:48 -0600
>Subject: Re: hard landing incident
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vedfolnir)
>Date: 12/3/03 1:35 AM Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>correct the other one was a R4D, fuk its been over 40 years o~;)
>the old Philosopher
Shit, you can remember where your round impact placement was on the 600 yard
line (Able Target), you should of known that the R5D wasn't a 2 engine job and
was not certified for static line operations. It couldn't slow down enough for
SL and fly at the same time. How many jumps did you say that you made from it?
You're working on the universe bullshit award.
- Re: hard landing incident, (continued)
- Re: hard landing incident,
ynotssor
- Re: hard landing incident,
chuck
- Re: hard landing incident,
ynotssor
- Re: hard landing incident,
SkydiverRick
- Re: hard landing incident,
chuck
- Re: hard landing incident,
ynotssor
- Re: hard landing incident,
Vedfolnir
- Re: hard landing incident,
chuck
- Re: hard landing incident,
Vedfolnir
- Re: hard landing incident,
chuck
- Re: hard landing incident,
Vedfolnir
- Re: hard landing incident,
chuck
- Re: hard landing incident,
Vedfolnir
- Re: hard landing incident,
Jerry K .
- Re: hard landing incident,
Jerry K .
- Re: hard landing incident,
SkydiverRick
- Re: hard landing incident,
Joe Walther
- Re: hard landing incident,
chuck