Re: mounting point of telebindings

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ulrich Hausmann  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> [1]- If you do a good job filling the holes, a redrilled ski is
>> just as strong as the original, just a tiny bit
>> heavier. Re-drilling is mostly a blow to your ego, not your skis.
>> If you ski enough, you realize that even the burliest skis only
>> have 100 days or so in them. Better to experiment on these skis
>> to get it right for the next pair.
>
>yep. But skis are (and will be) different. I don't think the next skis 
>will be the same as this ones anyway. Evolution is going on.
>
>And yes, you're right. Me, in one season (normally between 50 - 70 ski 
>days) i wear out a pair - that's good then in the new season for the 
>stones (on start of the season and in bad conditions).
>
>Thanks a lot for all advice (if you're interested i can try to tell how 
>a midfat feels with telebulldog).
>

_ I think everybody would be interested[1]. What occurred to me as I
was looking at the telebulldog web page is that it would be
possible to retrofit the thing to have an AT-like climbing mode.
It's got a pivot right at the toe anyway. In my experiments with
AT gear last season I was very impressed with how easy climbing
is in AT gear. Even NNN/BC is feels a bit stiff after climbing
with AT bindings. 

_ Booker C. Bense 

[1]- i.e. you, me and the couple other old farts that can't
stand telemarktips forum interface... 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBP8P1AWTWTAjn5N/lAQEbtwQAoihQS+34hs8qM/6Uhk+PulQx9RZ+Qnz/
YUMVmHvTG8YO2r113qt+g+Vow8GLx4K4ed5kHLimiFyic3bQ0FKAKz/eCmBg8GhB
Zm1bCk/JUtYbdXhmsGFcllbXgvykt8iWgcJUbM3teTp3YMS3RGfpJWaVHP4/4iJt
bDLugicQZ4w=
=cqVE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----