Re: Royalty Link-back?

in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Simba at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/3/03 3:09 PM:

> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Alex Heney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> <<a lot of mincing drivel>>
> 
>> Which means I do NOT approve of anyone accusing Scott of molesting
>> children, or any similar implication.
> 
> The Mark Spittal posts are from an letter to the editor that Scott's own
> brother wrote. Mark is the one who accused Scott of molesting him.

And you continue to perpetuate that lie.
> 
> Likewise, Scott has accused (endless times) his own mother, neighbor,
> priest and at least 3 other people of molesting him (Scott).

Endless times?  Lie some more.  Unlike my brother, I had no motive to lie.
There is no comparison.
> 
> AFAIK, nothing regarding molestation (Scott, mother, Mark, priest, Bert,
> sheep) has been decided in court. The circle jerk will continue.

Assholes like you will continue to lie.
> 
>> I think Scott made a mistake in publishing that link though. I'm sure
>> quite a few people who would not otherwise have seen the site will now
>> have done so, and will mostly think it a reasonable site.
> 
> Actually, Vinnie published the link. Scott and others quoted it giving it a
> much wider audience than if Vinnie had left it buried. Ironic that the
> so-called "ego-crazed" Ant never posted it once.
> 
>> It is no
>> more self promoting than most personal web sites, and has a lot of
>> interesting comment, well laid out.
> 
> She should give Bert "Mr. Internet" Hoff a few lessons in web design.

Bert could give her plenty of lessons in ethics, decency, and morality.  In
fact, he's been doing so for years.