
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
They SHOULD amend it, why the heck not I say. Maybe due to the fact that there is probably not that much audio to hear as with a shuttle mission? That's my guess currently. They should change the wording from "space shuttle" to "manned space missions". Tom On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:37:45 -0500, Jason Dugas wrote: > We recently had a discussion about this at the last club meeting of the > Johnson Space Center Amateur Radio Club (JSCARC). We also wanted to > retransmit ISS audio, but are not able to due to the fact that the law in > Part 97 specifically mentions "space shuttle" audio and does not include > ISS. In order to legally retransmit the ISS audio, the law would have to > be ammended or rewritten altogether. > > Jason > KB5URQ > > "Tom Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 04:45:11 -0500, Steen Eiler Jørgensen wrote: >> >> > Tom Randy wrote: >> > >> >> I'm not sure of the wattage but it's 1500 or less. They only transmit >> >> when a shuttle mission is up. It'll be quite a while until the next >> >> mission of coarse. I don't know if you'll hear them in Europe, >> >> depends on propagation. >> > >> > So they do *not* regularly transmit ISS-ground-communication? Is that >> > correct? >> >> >> Correct. They do not.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |