
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Hans K0HB" wrote: > > (snip) But I am also recommending, after > a generous period with 'training wheels', > a more strenuous qualification for > standard privileges than currently exists. > The QCAO and IOoDHW cries of "the > unfairness of it all" are deafening. The only thing I've heard is cries for proof that your license proposal actually addresses a real need within the Amateur Radio Service - something that fits the goals and purposes of that. What you've offered so far has certainly not provided that proof. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |