Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: The 14 Petitions



"Dwight Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

> Sure you do, Hans. Aren't you promoting an alternative licensing system
> with stiffer tests for newcomers?

Nope.  My proposal has a dramatically less strenuous set of qualifications
for newcomers.


> The key word is authorized, not expected, required, obligated, compelled,
> obliged, or whatever. A person can build radio equipment if he or she
wants,
> but there is no mandate to do so.

But there IS a mandate that each licensee is directly responsible for the
proper adjustment and operation of their equipment, including all sorts of
QCAO-unfriendly things like signal purity, etc.  97.307(a) thru (e) come to
mind.  Personally, I don't believe that your (misnamed) Technician
qualification examination is adequate to ensure that you can carry out that
mandate.

73, de Hans, K0HB









<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.