
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Hi Mr Gizmo, Thanks for your input. I'm not actually going to design the hardware myself, I plan on getting a student to do this as part of their their electrical engineering degree. I will establish the requirements, fund the project and meet all the requirements set out by the tertiary institution, as well as work on the software side of things myself. I also plan to check all code going in to the system. A clear list of requirements needs to be outlined before February, which is why I am asking for the input of those who post here. My primary goals are to design a system that is - - Low cost - Expandable - Simple - Reliable - Able to function without a computer attached I have been doing some research and believe all of these goals are possible, even at a cost even an amateur can afford. If you have any other suggestions, or anyone else does, please post and let me know. Thanks, The Other Guy "mrgizmo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm not too sure on the software, but for the hardware you can use a pic to > interface to the computer and using RS-232 to 485 trancievers you can get > many channels and achieve long distances between transmitter and reciever. > Programming the pics will be the real pain. > > "The Other Guy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for input from the pyro community in to what features are > > desirable from a computer-controlled electronic firing system. I would > like > > to create a firing system that could potentially scale to all levels of > the > > industry, but targeted particularly at the amateur who perhaps only would > > need the system for one or two shows each year. These users can't justify > a > > large investment in hardware, or spend thousands of dollars on software > that > > will rarely be used. > > > > I hope to be able to make the hardware design available on the Internet, > and > > perhaps sell complete systems to interested individuals to cover costs. > > > > What would you like to see in terms of both hardware and software? > > > > What would the amateur consider a reasonable investment in electronic > firing > > equipment? (Right now the plan is not to profit from this, only cover > > costs - making the software open source is an option). > > > > What have your experiences been with existing systems, such as > reliability, > > and practicality? > > > > How can they be improved upon? > > > > Thanks for your input. If there is sufficient interest I will investigate > > the this further. > > > > The Other Guy > > > > > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |