
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Patrick Hamlyn says...
> You just contradicted yourself.
I should hope he did, this being a paradox.
> This sentence:
> >When the time came actually to volunteer for the flogging, I
> >would have no reason whatsoever to do it
> is immediately contradicted by this one:
> >Since I would know this in advance, I don't
> >see how I could form the intention to do it.
>
> You only have to look ahead *one sentence* to see that the fact that you can't
> form an intention and therefore can't claim the money without getting flogged,
> is sufficient reason to volunteer for the flogging.
Until 12:01.
Actually, if one alters the original problem such that it is a *given*
that such a machine (the MRI-intention-reader) exists, a logical mind
might be willing to take the flogging at 7:29 simply to avoid any
possible temporal disasters that might arise from contradicting the
machine's findings. Forget the $1M, I just don't want to wink out of
existence.
--
Robert Hutchinson | "[Destiny's Child] got booed at the NBA
| playoffs. Even men in plush animal costumes
| don't get booed at the NBA playoffs."
| -- Fametracker.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |