
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Wedding photography versus altitude
- __From__: Michael A. Covington
- __Subject__: Re: Wedding photography versus altitude
- __Date__: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 22:54:49 -0600
"Leicaddict" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Especially with the new "Gay" marriage law in Mass (soon to spread to the
> rest of the US), I can see Wedding photography becoming really, really
> lucrative. Your friend may be singing another song this time next year.
Why will that make it more lucrative? Only a few percent of the population
would be candidates for "gay marriage" and I don't see why it's more
lucrative than ordinary marriage...
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude, (continued)
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Alan Browne
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Ken Hart
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Enough
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Vince
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Bob Ford
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Tony Spadaro
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Railfan
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Leicaddict
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Michael A. Covington
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Timo Labrenz
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
jjs
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
zeitgeist
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
omaken
- Re: Wedding photography versus altitude,
Michael Scarpitti