
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nick Zentena wrote: > > > stacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Xenars don't seem to sell for very much. I've got a 150mm and a 127mm. > > The > > 150mm wasn't very much and the 127mm came free with a camera. Best thing > > about the 127mm was the 0 shutter that I was able to screw a 150mm Claron > > right into. My 150mm is just fine if a person didn't want a lot of > > movement. > > > > > > It's weird, almost every xenar I've used works great except that 135mm f4.7. > The 75mm one on the rolleicord is a really good performer and I have a 35mm > folder than has a 50 f3.5 that is sharp as a tack. Not sure what the deal > with the 135mm one is but it seems to be a dog for some reason.. > -- > > Stacey For some reason the 127mm, f/4.7 Xenar has excessive coma very similar to the Wollensak Raptar/Optar. If you look at a small highlight near a corner at full aperture you will see its smeared out roughly in a teardrop shape. As you stop down the smearing becomes less. All Tessars have some coma when wide open but for the 135mm, f/4.5 Zeiss Tessar or 127mm, f/4.7 Ektar, the coma is gone at f/8 and the corners are quite sharp at f/11. Both the Xenar and Raptar/Optar must be stopped down nearly all the way to eliminate the coma. Both Xenar and Raptar are quite sharp in the center when wide open. I suspect a design problem rather than a manufacturing error. I wonder how both designs got to be so wrong. Other Xenars do not suffer from this fault. The two I have in Rollei cameras have little coma and are very sharp. I have other Wollensak lenses which are very good but somehow the lenses for the Speed Graphic and Wollensak Enlarging Raptars have real problems. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |