
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Art Reitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I can't find a reference on this, so am I thinking straight? A 4x5 > film, taking the longer dimension, is 5inches = 127mm. So if a lens > has an image diameter of 127mm or more it will cover 4x5, right? And > the larger it is, the more movements permitted? So on, say, a 75mm lens > what would be a reasonable minimum image diameter for some modest > movements for landscapes? > Thanks. > Art Calculate diagonal using Pythagorean theorem: sqrt(4^2 + 5^2) = 6.4" = 163mm. Less due to clipping in film holders.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |