
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Art Reitsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I can't find a reference on this, so am I thinking straight? A 4x5 > film, taking the longer dimension, is 5inches = 127mm. So if a lens > has an image diameter of 127mm or more it will cover 4x5, right? And > the larger it is, the more movements permitted? So on, say, a 75mm lens > what would be a reasonable minimum image diameter for some modest > movements for landscapes? > Thanks. > Art > A "normal" lens has a focal length equal to the diagonal of the format. For 4x5 _film_ that is about 152mm (6 inches). Sheet film of 4x5 and larger is slightly smaller than the "nominal" size to allow its being used in adaptors in glass plate holders. Many 4x5 press cameras have 127mm or 135mm lenses because press photographers prefered to have slightly wide angle lenses. Since the lenses were used well stopped down for depth of field anyway a normal lens of the Tessar type would provide this coverage. However, they are working right at their limit of coverage. If you want movements you must use either a longer lens or a true wide angle lens, that is, one with coverage substantially larger than the format diagonal. One reason that Dagors were so popular for view camera use is that they will cover nearly 90degrees. Modern Plasmat type lenses, like the Rodenstock Sirronar or Schneider Symmar, cover a minimum of 75 degrees and the newer ones more, so they are, if not true wide angle lenses, certainly wide field. Dagors are inferior in correction to Plasmats but are much smaller and lighter, probably not a problem for 4x5. Tessars will cover about 60 degrees maximum but it varies a little. Generally, the faster the lens the less it covers. Wider angles are gotten with other designs of lenses. Most modern true wide angle lenses for press and view cameras are of a type based on a lens by the Russian designer Roosinov. This type has less fall off of light than the standard design of lens. A general answer to your question is that the maximum coverage angle of a lens depends on its design. Some lenses have much larger image circles for a given focal length than others. On the small side one has lenses like the Goerz Artar or Dogmar with about 48 degree maximum coverage and on the other hand a lens like the current Super-Angulon with perhaps 105degrees. Obviously, the shortest focal length that can be used with a particular format size depends on the type of lens. "Normal" coverage is about 53 degrees. You can calculate the angle a lens covers for a given format dimension from: Angle = 2*arctan [(size/FL)/2] Where size is any image dimension of interest, normally the diagonal but can be length or width if you want to know the viewing angle. Note that perspective is dependant exclusively on the camera position with regard to the subject. Once the camera is placed the focal length does not affect the perspective only the size of the image on the film. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |