
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Norm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need some advice on a compact camera. I have looked at some APS models > and some compact 35 mm models. Can someone point out the significant > differences or post a link or 2. I'm not sure which format would be best > for me. Thanks in advance. Since you describe yourself as an amateur looking for a compact camera, I'd say go by the model of camera, not the film format. You've probably noticed there's a greater number of 35mm than APS models, so statistically, I'd guess you're more likely to end up with 35mm. APS is 'supposed' to have three main advantages over 35mm which are: (1) Simple film loading - drop in the APS cassette, shut the hatch and the camera does the rest. However, loading 35mm film isn't exactly rocket science and most modern 35mm cameras have automatic loading anyhow. (2) Three picture formats - APS cameras let you choose between 'HDTV', 'Classic' and 'Panoramic' formats. Unfortunately, this is really a gimmick since the image recorded on the film is exactly the same (HDTV) whatever format you choose. It gets cropped during printing if you choose the others. Obviously, you can just as easily get your full frame prints blown up and them crop them to any format you want in 35mm just as easily as APS. That's what I do. (3) Improved Print Quality - the APS film has a magnetic layer on which the camera can record info about how each exposure was made. This info can be used by auto printing machines to optimise the settings for each print. In 5 years of shooting APS I can't say I've noticed that minilab prints from APS are on average better than from 35mm. And if you want the best possible prints from your negatives (APS or 35mm), you get them hand-made by a person who knows what they're doing and actually LOOKS at your negatives. Conversely, 35mm also has advantages over APS: Image size - the image on the film is a bit bigger in 35mm than APS, so 35mm will have the edge in final image quality, all other things being equal. Choice of film types - 35mm has probably a wider choice of film types available than any other format. There are some good APS films, but the overall range available is quite limited. Running costs - APS films cost more than comparable 35mm films. APS processing costs are also more than for 35mm. Flexibility - If you like doing your own processing or darkroom work, APS is not going to be your friend, while 35mm can be fun. All that said, if the camera you like best is an APS camera, go for it. The system works well and can give very good results. Straightforward, trouble-free photography is what it's all about. -- a n n @ n i m o t t i . p o r t 5 . c o m
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |