
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lewis Lang wrote: > I believe you may be thinking of the 50/1.2 L FD lens, the 50/1.4 FD I owned > was not an L lens though it certainly had L quality stopped down a tocuh (wide > open it was quite soft and the Nikon was better in this aspect of wide open > sharpness, bokeh effects aside). The 50/1.2, I believe came in both L and > non-L > versions, the 50/1.4 was just a standard FD lens (not an L). Could be, it was 15 years ago. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 972-54-608-069 Icq/AIM Uin: 2661079 MSN IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Not for email)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |