
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Marie A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > Gee marie, I think you qualify as a super-kook. You just told us the > > Supreme court broke the law, and doesn't have the power to review and > > decide cases that come before it. --Not. > > > My good man, what I told you was something quite different, namely > that the SC gets to pick and choose those cases which it will review > and those which it won't, the net effect of which is a de facto > reshaping of the culture as accords with what they believe needs > changing. What this effectively translates into is leftists hammering > on this and other federal courts with frivolous cases aimed at the > piecemeal usurpation of the sovereignty of states in legislating their > own affairs under the charade that some hitherto unknown right not > enumerated in the Constitution is being violated. > > That's what I told you. That you can't seem to grasp the danger this > poses for a democratic republic is quite another matter. You have to > understand a couple of things here. Liberals are generally > unprincipled in their approach to these matters, that which works for > them in the short term being the yardstick by which they gauge these > things. Bush v Gore notwithstanding, we have had a very liberal court > for the last 50 years, but that arrangement is not inscribed in > granite, my friend. Should that turn around with three more young > justices like Scalia and Thomas, a conservative court can likewise > reshape this society in ways you can't even dream of. > > How can they do this, you ask? Well, the same exact way your crowd did > it in the last few decades. Give us a court like that and cases will > be brought before it challenging a whole host of issues you thought > were settled matters. And since this same court you loved when it > ruled your way now gets to cherry pick the cases it will hear, any > guesses as to what's going to start happening? What will happen is > YOUR ox will start to get gored, and big time. > > You are not a very bright person, sir, if you can't grasp the idea That letoured is "not a very bright person" is already well established here in the newsgroup, Marie. ;-) Neil > that what you use to pummel your adversaries won't one day be turned > around on you in like fashion. You just got a taste of that in 2000, > and plenty more is coming down the road if the republicans stick to > their guns and get a couple more Scalias on that bench. > > Cordially, Marie
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |