Re: "Vigorous agitation"?

On 12/3/2003 6:38 AM jjs spake thus:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Nebenzahl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Perhaps not, but maybe it's not a question of the developer but the film. I 
> > notice that Kodak recommends "vigorous agitation at 30-second intervals" for 
> > TMY (in the little chart inside the film package). What do you know 
> > about this?
>
> I know that Kodak must have a different concept of agitaion than
> roll-development on reels. Even development is a positive b*ch with TM*!

Hmm; hasn't been a problem here, and I've only just started using the stuff 
(in that newfangled miniature rollfilm format).

By the way, I notice that for TMX, Kodak merely recommends "agitation at 
30-second intervals", dropping the "vigorous". Can we trust their technical 
writers to be precise (and consistent) with language?


--
Polls are the standardized test used by the media to determine
how well we have learned what it has taught us.

- Sam Smith, author of _Why Bother? Getting a Life in a Locked Down Land_