
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:27:16 GMT, "Linda Terrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 21:51:07 UTC, Bob Brenchley. ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:41:12 GMT, "Linda Terrell" >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >Science Diet is better for kittens in that it has a higher >> >> >fat content which kittens need. Also it is one of the lowest >> >> >in magnesium. >> >> > >> >> >Compare the fat content in SD to any of the others. Fat >> >> >content in canned food, BTW, is very low. So don't feed >> >> >it exclusively. >> >> >> >> What total and absolute rubbish. Kittens should NEVER - EVER be fed >> >> dry food. While it may be ok to give a fully grown cat some dry food, >> >> tinned food is always the best way to ensure a healthy diet for any >> >> cat. >> > >> > >> >Following my Vet's advice. - canned doesn't have enough fat content. >> >so kitten gets a mix. >> >> Canned food for kittens has all the fat they are gong to need - as >> well as the most important ingredient of all - water. >> > >> >And all my cats have eaten dry food daily over 35 years. >> >> You are very lucky - many cats are not. >> > >> >And they are Indoor cats, all the time. >> >> Why do you boast about being an animal abuser? > > > >Jesus still loves you how can a half mythical man who has been dead for two thousand years love anything? Do please learn to engage what passes for a brain in your head before posting such utter rubbish. > >Because He has to > >I only abuse people like you. > >LT -- Bob. Your IQ score is 2 (it takes 3 to grunt).
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |