
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:42:32 GMT, "Linda Terrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:51:46 UTC, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >> I have taken my 4 month old kitten to the vets (vets 4 pets - UK) and they >> suggest that the Hills science plan is the best kitten/cat food you can buy >> at the moment. >> >> Has anyone else tried this and what did you think to it? >> >> I know the 'vets 4 pets' is a big company but I was just thinking that they >> might push this food to boost there sales more. At the moment I am feeding >> the kitten Whiskers tin kitten food and the vet said that this food isn't >> that good as the meat content is very low, I must admit it does make the >> kittens wee quite smelly. >> >> Graham. > >Science Diet is better for kittens in that it has a higher >fat content which kittens need. Also it is one of the lowest >in magnesium. > >Compare the fat content in SD to any of the others. Fat >content in canned food, BTW, is very low. So don't feed >it exclusively. What total and absolute rubbish. Kittens should NEVER - EVER be fed dry food. While it may be ok to give a fully grown cat some dry food, tinned food is always the best way to ensure a healthy diet for any cat. > >LT -- Bob. You have not been charged for this lesson. Please pass it to all your friends so they may learn as well.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |