Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Best cat food.



On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 17:42:32 GMT, "Linda Terrell"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:51:46 UTC, "Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>> I have taken my 4 month old kitten to the vets (vets 4 pets - UK) and they
>> suggest that the Hills science plan is the best kitten/cat food you can buy
>> at the moment.
>> 
>> Has anyone else tried this and what did you think to it?
>> 
>> I know the 'vets 4 pets' is a big company but I was just thinking that they
>> might push this food to boost there sales more. At the moment I am feeding
>> the kitten Whiskers tin kitten food and the vet said that this food isn't
>> that good as the meat content is very low, I must admit it does make the
>> kittens wee quite smelly.
>> 
>> Graham.
>
>Science Diet is better for kittens in that it has a higher
>fat content which kittens need. Also it is one of the lowest
>in magnesium.
>
>Compare the fat content in SD to any of the others.  Fat
>content in canned food, BTW, is very low. So don't feed
>it exclusively.

What total and absolute rubbish. Kittens should NEVER - EVER be fed
dry food. While it may be ok to give a fully grown cat some dry food,
tinned food is always the best way to ensure a healthy diet for any
cat.
>
>LT 

-- 
Bob.

You have not been charged for this lesson. Please pass it to all your
friends so they may learn as well.




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.