
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Jon C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Agua Girl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "Jon C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Um, he didn't kill the cats. > > > > > > Read the article next time before posting a long message blasting > > something > > > that wasn't even said. > > > > > > The guy turned the cats over to the shelter. > > > > " He started trapping the cats and taking > > them down and dropping them off at the animal shelter. Most neighbors > > eventually thought to check the shelter when their cats disappeared, > > but one cat had no ID and was euthanized within a few days" > > > > He turned an animal over to a shelter with a kill policy. Just because > > he didn't do the deed himself doesn't make him less responsible. > > > > Read the article next time :-) > > > > AG > > Well, I think that any cat owner who both 1) doesn't check the local shelter > when their cat goes missing for several days and 2) allows cats to be > outdoors without any sort of ID shouldn't be surprised when the cat gets > euthanized. The guy did the right thing, and he didn't kill any cats. > > Your post made it obvious that you didn't read the article. "We don't take > it into our hands to trap and kill cats." You messed up, get over it. > > What exactly do you refer to when you use the word 'euthenized'...? I think it means taking a life to stop suffering. How can anyone think this is euthenizing? I think you mean euphemism.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |