Re: Bush goes ahead with privatization anyway

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
says...
> 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Re:
> > > President Bush may be getting his butt kicked in Afghanistan and Iraq,.
> >=====
> 
> > I think his butt isn't getting inconvenienced at all.
> >-----------
> 
> His personal butt? I agree. Bush wouldn't be anywhere NEAR the real action.

Yep, more or less like you.
> ====================
> 
> > > there can be little doubt his "homeland" offensive is in high gear. Fueled
> > > by Republican control of both chambers of Congress,....
> >=====
> 
> > You mean "the will of the people"? They were elected, right, or do you
> > think the supreme court appointed all of them, too?
> >------------
> 
> Who said anything about "the will of the people?"

I did. You have reading problems?
> ====================
> 
> > Do you think the energy business is morally inferior to the victim and
> > race industry that fills the democrat's coffers?
> >-------------
> 
> Who said anything about being "moral?"
I did. Still having reading problems?> ====================
> 
> > > to opening the Rocky
> > > Mountain Front for oil and gas exploitation,
> >======
> 
> > That would be a good thing for sure.
> >-------------
> 
> Lemme guess - you're a lemming Republican - right?

Nope. Not registered republican. Voted for Clinton, then voted for Gore. 
Probably go for Dean next. Your cute little world must be real black and 
white. I guess for lost little puppies like you that's some kind of 
comfort.
> ====================
> 
> > Don't they just vote in congress and your extremist views lose pretty
> > much every time? What's not democratic about that?
> >-------------
> 
> That was covered in the second section (above) - didja miss it? Here it is
> again...
> 
> "Fueled by Republican control of both chambers of Congress,..."
> 
> Didja get it better that time?

Pretty much got it. Thanks. What I got was that both houses of congress 
are republican dominated due to the votes in all of the states and 
congressional districts. That would be that democracy thing you seem so 
worried about going away.
> ====================
> 
> > > While few would
> > > expect Montana to be the point state in Bush's attacks on democracy, that's
> > > exactly what's happening.
> >====
> 
> > A little hyperbole here don't you agree?
> >------------
> 
> I agree with the author. "Bush's attacks on democracy" is exactly what's
> happening.

So the voters will turn him out then, huh. I don't think so. Do you?
> ====================
> 
> > Terrifically upset? I really doubt you can stir much up about his kind of
> > thing.
> >------------
> 
> You can doubt whatever you wish. Enjoy yourself.

I do. Wish you could too. You are so uptight it must hurt.
> ====================
> 
> > > Isn't it convenient that Montana's Content Analysis Team, right here in
> > > good old Missoula (a known bastion of progressive thinking), was one of the
> > > first to be "studied" for outsourcing under a directive from the Bush
> > > administration?
> >=====
> 
> > Yep, I think it is very convenient. I endorse it.
> >------------
> 
> Endorse this: I think your nose is still up former Montana Gov. Marc Racicot's
> ass - right?

Never met him. Don't know much about him. Is it important to you that I 
am some kind of fan of the guy? Helps keep your world simple?
> ====================
> 
> > Son, you need to get just a bit deeper and cost out the fed retirement
> > benefits and related expense.
> >-------------
> 
> Son, if you have some documentation, sourcing, graphs, news articles - anything
> to support your statements  - it's OK to post it.

Do tell. Is that how your internet works? If I wanted to educate you I'd 
take you as a deduction on my taxes. Find your own crap boy.
> ====================
> 
> > > When George Bush was campaigning for president, one of his loudest gripes
> > > was that the Clinton administration had run roughshod over the states by
> > > issuing edicts establishing national monuments and roadless areas.
> >=====
> 
> > And you liked that, right?
> >-------------
> 
> I like our elected presidents (which do not include Bush) to do "the will of
> the people." (Oops - I think you mentioned that above, right?)

So you are a Ronald Reagan fan. Nice puppy.
> ====================
> 
> > Man you sure do hold a grudge way past the time you can do anything about
> > it.
> >------------
> 
> Man, you sure are a non-thinker. I've posted these quotations before,
> but they're appropriate here again. Try to comprehend - or ask somebody for
> help:
> 
> "To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are
> to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile,
> but is morally treasonable to the American public." - Republican President
> Teddy Roosevelt

Teddy ain't running for office is he? Here is a quote for you. "Fuck 
you." Tennessee Williams. There. Proves the point.
> ====
> 
> "This country with its institutions belongs to the people who inhabit it.
> Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government they can exercise
> their democratic right to alter or amend it or their revolutionary right to
> dismember or overthrow it." - Abraham Lincoln in his First Inaugural Address
> ====
I think he got head shot for suspending habeas corpus. He a hero of 
yours?
> 
> "A true patriot would keep the attention of his fellow citizens awake to their
> grievances, and not allow them to rest 'til the causes of their just complaints
> are removed." - Sam Adams/Sons of Liberty, Boston, Massachusetts, 1771.
> ====
They make fine beer.
> 
> So, I guess we can either consider the words of Roosevelt, Lincoln and Adams -
> or we can listen to you.
> 
> I'll take Door #1.
> ====================
Goodie.
> 
> > ..Gore took big cities and not much else.
> >------------
> 
> You think Gore getting over a half-million MORE votes than Bush did across the
> breadth of the country (not to mention 93,000 disenfranchised voters that his
> brother fixed in Florida) is "not much else?" Shrewd! Don't let anyone call YOU
> a non-thinking lemming!  ;-)
> ====================

It's ok if you feel better namecalling. Whatever helps get you out of the 
comic books.
> 
> > That is a rehash of a rehash of discredited diatribe. Read up.
> > >-----------
> 
> You're an uninformed, non-thinking fool. Catch up on current events (not what
> you're fed by your GOP spin machine) and THEN open your mouth.
> ====================
You mean "THEN start keying"?  I expect you are real used to people 
pretty much ignoring your instructions.
> 
> > Better than sending the money to the ghettos, I reckon.
> >------------
> 
> You can "reckon" whatever you want.

Might nice of you being a lover of democracy and all.
> ====================
> 
> > Let me see here. You want the federal employees to come up with the idea
> > to outsource their jobs to save money and for them to take up to their
> > bosses?
> >-------------
> 
> No - I want ill-informed people like you to mimic the party line, swallow
> whatever you're fed, and try to regurgitate it to the rest of us as if it were
> a good thing.
> ====================

"The rest of us"? You do have a mouse in your pocket don't you. Anyway, 
if you are right, the voters will throw out the trash and elect your 
guys, right?
> 
> > On behalf of taxpayers, thank Mr. Bush.
> >--------------
> 
> Covered above. See the part where it says "You're a fool."
> ====================

A provocative point. Right there above your eyebrows.
> 
> > Good. At least they can read.
> >-------------
> 
> It's something you should try before reaching for your keyboard.

You are a nice sport. Thanks for sharing your perspective.
> 
> 
>