Re: Expressive Association vs. Anti-Discrimination Laws

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:46:05 GMT, "nudistfamily"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


>When you combine the NJ public accommodations law, the Dale opinion, and the
>Alessandra's Smile decision,
>
>it is clear to me that a private membership club based on FAMILY social nudism, could
>EASILY 

<discriminate against>

>single, childless males (or females, for that matter), 

or anyone else it damn well pleases for any or no reason at all

>AND could still have "facilities"
>or "accommodations" (rooms, etc.), as long as the club
>in its bylaws, membership standards, etc., clearly and sincerely emphasized its it 
>focus
>on FAMILY social nudism.

And that would make it right, so there!

-T.
(move along folks, nothing to see here)