
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Particle Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mario Gretzky wrote:Since when do "hands" count as clothes? It's possible to be naked without revealing "naughty" parts. Call it strategically nude, if you must, but it's still nude.
David Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
So I hear that Sarah McLachlan's new Fallen video has some artistically nude scenes. Has anybody seen it yet?
Don't waste your time folks. There is no nudity. Just her covering her breasts with her hands
nude/naked (n.) - without clothes
Looks like nudity doesn't require nipples to be shown on your TV screen. If she covers her naked breasts with her naked arm I guess she's still NAKED! Did you expect her to be rubbing her nipples on the camera lens?
This ain't rocket science.
You're nitpicking.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |