
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
> So, again, if, when you come upon the very >common phrase "polyphonic texture", it means nothing to you other than >that there is more than one pitch sounding at once, go in peace. well, i thought we were discussing the word 'polyphony' when you add qualifiers and deflect your discussions to such as 'early polyphony' and 'polyphonic texture' to distinguish meanings you are discussing different words. polyphony means more than one voice. polyphonic texture means different things at different times in history, and there are numerous such textures, so changing from a discussion of the noun polyphony to the adjective polyphonic is really not relevant to the debate. i have read the whole thread, and your arguments don't jibe with music history or the history of english usage.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |