
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 22 Oct 2003 19:03:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Lacoste) wrote: >Looking to upgrade the integrated sound card (!!!) on my P3 (500 MHz) >to something that actually works and sounds better. The following >seem to come up quite a bit: > >Edirol SD-20 >Audiophile 2496 >Delta 44 or 66 >Echo Mia > >I want to be able to record live music, from microphones through a >mixer into the computer, as well as multi-track record from a synth. >I am looking for the best playback (ie. realistic sounding >instruments) as I can get for not TOO much money (<$400US), and with >minimum latency, esp. for recording while playing back. So..., > >Am I looking in the right direction? >Any preferences? >Any other options? >Do any of the above lack something that I might want - I have a >midi-USB connector, so I understand that the latency should be >comparable if I go with a sound card that does not have midi, yes/no? > >Thanks >Martin Lacoste the SD-20 is an external sound module, isn't it? The others are pci sound cards. The Echo Mia and M-Audio Audiophile are the usual recommendations for an entry-level audio card for serious use. If you want more inputs and/or outputs, both makers offer a range of cards. Look at www.echoaudio.com and www.midiman.com for specs. Not sure what you mean by your latency question. These cards don't have built-in sounds like consumer cards (Audigy etc.) do. They are all capable of low-latency audio. Midi latency isn't an issue. Look at my CubaseFAQ page www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm for an explanation of how latency affects the computer musician. CubaseFAQ page www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |