Re: 1977 Album Survivor Round 3 - results

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (SavoyBG) wrote:

> >That Rolling Stone 500 list has plenty of 
> >"three-chord"-type music on it, yet no Thorogood. I wonder why that is? 
> 
> Probably because the list is fucking horrible?

No...think a little harder. There's a better explanation.

> >Could it be that Rolling Stone *also* doesn't think as simplistically as 
> >you, rating all "three-chord" music as equally virtuous and desirably 
> >"pure"?
> 
> Why would I care what Rolling Stone thought?
> Why are you so impressed with shit like Rolling Stone and critics' favorites?

Why are you so impressed with *yourself*? And why do you think anyone 
else should be? Especially since you have a more ferocious "agenda" than 
almost any critic I've ever read?

> Mike G, does the G stand for Gullable?

When tossing out insults about someone's intelligence, it's always best 
to correctly spell the words in the insult.

> Just as there are even more people who think that Yanni made good records. As
> of 1996 Yanni had 4 platinum albums and one gold album, and that's just in
> America.

Oh, then I guess he must be better than Thorogood, huh? (Frantically 
thumbing through your Gospel of Sales Statistics yet again, I see....)