
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Tommy T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > W.G: Well.....If you think trying to unravel the secrets of the universe is > boring. > > TT: I missed reading the post where I said that. I was director and > principal astronomer at the Chaco Observatory > > > WG:......I never said that the hard sciences don't present an > intellectual challenge....All I said is that one doesn't spend ones time > unlearning what some human being > > TT: Let us say "Newton," for example > > > WG: chooses to call something, and relearning > what some other human being > > TT: Let us say "Einstein," for example > > WG: with more and bigger guns chooses to call > it. > > TT: And after Einstein we can continue through supersymmetry and string > theory to superceed General Relativity with a unified Theory of Everything, > and on and on . . . In cosmology, if one doesn't unlearn yesterday's > limited view and master today's set of problems, one will not be ready for > the unimaginable changes that will come tomorrow. > > WG:That isn't intellectual stimulation. What that is, is horse > shit......... > > TT: Do you realize that you are calling the entire history of science > "horse shit?" > > Tommy T. > > See my post above....You still don't get it, do you? What did you say you had a PhD in? Where did I mention the entire history of science? Do you really think that Newton and Einstein were just changing the names of the same principals? Don't you realize that Einsteins developments were a more accurate refinement of perfectly valid older theory? - What has this got to do with changing the name of some African country because of a coup?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |