
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 19 Nov 2003 22:20:27 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Al Carruth) wrote: >>Well Ally, you don't let any grass grow underfoot! >> >>I was going to suggest an easy and non-destructive test to try. Load the back >>with a lump of poster adhesive (Blu-Tac or Fun-Tac) which will drop the pitch a >>bit. You can move it around, add and subtract weight, until you find the back >>pitch that is most effective. The spot the works with the least amount of added >>weight is the place to remove wood. Making a brace or the back thinner will >>lower its resonance frequency. >> >>Usually 'tuning' the back will not effect the trebles directly, or, a most, one >>or two specific notes. It does change the balance, though. >> >>Benoit: >>I usually try to use my sine wave generator to look at glitter patterns when I >>can. I have determined some of the resonance frequencies of some guitars using >>recordings, usually of taps on the bridge, although you can pick them out of >>musical recordings if you have a pretty big sample. Sometimes you can pick up >>tap pitches with a tuner, but most of the time te signal doesn't last long >>enough, and you have to hum the pitch to get it. >> >>Alan Carruth / Luthier Alan, Could I get your input on a similar problem with another guitar? Please see: "Boominess on one acoustic guitar string (acoustic guitar)", in rec.music.makers.acoustic Thanks, Ally
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |