
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:42:49 -0500, Joe Kesselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guitars exist with interchangable fretboards having > strangely split frets to deal with this. Not playing > anything with strings, I can't vouch for how well they work. Messy to play, it sounds like. > Which is why some keyboard instruments tuned to just > intonation had a few additional keys to provide alternate > versions of one or two critical notes. I believe there are still some organs with 'extra' keys. There's a lot of difference between F# and Gb, for instance, if your temperament is based on C. > I'm told my concertina was probably set up that way when it was first > manufactured; it's been retuned since then to equal temperment. Grrr. Why can't people leave thngs alone? > During the period where equal temperment was first gaining > favor, there were folks deliberately writing pieces which > displayed the flaws of specific tunings... The main > advantage of equal temperment is that you can play in all > keys equally well (or poorly). It's all equally bad <g>. To be fair, some modern music does need fully 'equal' temperament (and there's a reason I don't like most of that music <g>)... > I've been waiting for someone to introduce a smart keyboard > which dynamically microtunes itself to try to give you the > best of both worlds. Problem is, nobody except another > hyper-instrument networked with it would be able to play in > tune with it. It can't be done without knowledge of the key structure of the piece. The tunings needed to get 'perfect' chords in C are different from those in Am, and 'passing' notes and chords will really mess things up. If you've modulated to a different key, you'd need to tell the machine... Chris C
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |