
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Hello, there, everyone, and some recent discussions of 15th-century tuning systems based on a kind of modified Pythagorean tuning with a Wolf fifth among _musica recta_ notes (e.g. D-A or A-E), and with certain schismatic thirds (Pythagorean diminished fourths or augmented seconds) simplified to pure ratios of 5:4 and 6:5, has prompted me to post a 12-note well-temperament which _might_ have been derived from such a tuning system. The example here is derived from one 12-note tuning set in the manuscript _Volens facere clavicordium_, as ably explicated by Roland Hutchinson, with one convenient choice: the system apparently has C#/Db at either 135/128 or 16/15 above C depending on the octave, and here I've used 135/128. The basic idea is to adjust the two notes of the Wolf fifth, D-A, a syntonic comma (81:80, ~21.51 cents) narrow in the original scheme, so that the lower note D is moved down 1/3 syntonic comma, and the upper note A moved up by the same amount, leaving this fifth impure by 1/3-comma (~7.17 cents). This amount of tempering, applied to three fifths in the tuning, is identical to that in the 1/3-comma meantone of Salinas (1577), earlier discussed and described as "languid" by Zarlino (1571); and almost identical to that in the 19-tone equal temperament advocated by Costeley (1570) with 19 equal thirdtones to an octave. Interestingly, as Mark Lindley has noted, the kind of temperament produced by such a procedure is very similar to the system of Charles, Earl of Stanhope (1806), a well-temperament where some fifths are tempered by up to 1/3 sytonic comma. Please let me caution that while this procedure produces something than can indeed be called a "well-temperament" under a conventional 18th-century definition, it isn't necessarily ideal for English keyboard music around 1600, the topic of a lot of these discussions about 15th-century tunings. For example E-G#-B will have a major third over 19 cents wide of 5:4, and only a schisma (~1.95 cents) narrow of Pythagorean. Here's a Scala file for the tuning showing steps other than the tempered ones as integer ratios. Values in cents are shown for the tempered steps -- for values in cents for all steps and intervals in the tuning, see the data further below. ---------------- Scala file starts on next line of text -------------- ! anovolwt.scl ! Well-tempered variation on _Volens facere clavicordium_ (15th c.) 12 ! 135/128 196.74124 32/27 5/4 4/3 45/32 3/2 128/81 891.52748 16/9 15/8 2/1 ---------- Scala file ended on newline after previous line of text ------ Here is some data from Scala on the locations of steps and sizes of intervals in cents, etc.: | Well-tempered variation on _Volens facere clavicordium_ (15th c.) 0: 1/1 0.000000 unison, perfect prime 1: 135/128 92.17876 major limma, large chroma 2: 196.741 cents 196.7413 3: 32/27 294.1351 Pythagorean minor third 4: 5/4 386.3139 major third 5: 4/3 498.0452 perfect fourth 6: 45/32 590.2239 tritone 7: 3/2 701.9553 perfect fifth 8: 128/81 792.1803 Pythagorean minor sixth 9: 891.527 cents 891.5278 10: 16/9 996.0905 Pythagorean minor seventh 11: 15/8 1088.269 classic major seventh 12: 2/1 1200.000 octave | Temperings of 5/4 3/2 0: 0.000: 0.0000 0.0000 1: 92.179: 19.5526 -1.9537 2: 196.741: 7.1688 -7.1688 3: 294.135: 21.5063 0.0000 4: 386.314: 19.5526 0.0000 5: 498.045: 7.1688 0.0000 6: 590.224: 19.5526 0.0000 7: 701.955: 0.0000 -7.1688 8: 792.180: 21.5063 0.0000 9: 891.527: 14.3375 -7.1688 10: 996.090: 14.3375 0.0000 11: 1088.269: 19.5526 0.0000 12: 1200.000: 0.0000 0.0000 | Temperings of 6/5 3/2 0: 0.000: -21.5063 0.0000 1: 92.179: -21.5063 -1.9537 2: 196.741: -14.3375 -7.1688 3: 294.135: -19.5526 0.0000 4: 386.314: 0.0000 0.0000 5: 498.045: -21.5063 0.0000 6: 590.224: -14.3375 0.0000 7: 701.955: -21.5063 -7.1688 8: 792.180: -19.5526 0.0000 9: 891.527: -7.1688 -7.1688 10: 996.090: -19.5526 0.0000 11: 1088.269: -7.1688 0.0000 12: 1200.000: -21.5063 0.0000 | Temperings of 19/16 3/2 0: 0.000: -3.3780 0.0000 1: 92.179: -3.3780 -1.9537 2: 196.741: 3.7907 -7.1688 3: 294.135: -1.4243 0.0000 4: 386.314: 18.1283 0.0000 5: 498.045: -3.3780 0.0000 6: 590.224: 3.7907 0.0000 7: 701.955: -3.3780 -7.1688 8: 792.180: -1.4243 0.0000 9: 891.527: 10.9595 -7.1688 10: 996.090: -1.4243 0.0000 11: 1088.269: 10.9595 0.0000 12: 1200.000: -3.3780 0.0000 | Interval class, Number of incidences, Size: 1: 1 256/243 90.225 cents Pythagorean limma 1: 4 135/128 92.179 cents major limma, large chroma 1: 1 97.394 cents 1: 1 99.347 cents 1: 2 104.563 cents 1: 3 16/15 111.731 cents minor diatonic semitone 2: 2 189.572 cents 2: 2 196.741 cents 2: 2 4096/3645 201.956 cents 2: 6 9/8 203.910 cents major whole tone 3: 4 32/27 294.135 cents Pythagorean minor third 3: 3 1215/1024 296.089 cents 3: 2 301.304 cents 3: 2 308.473 cents 3: 1 6/5 315.641 cents minor third 4: 2 5/4 386.314 cents major third 4: 2 393.482 cents 4: 2 400.651 cents 4: 4 512/405 405.866 cents narrow diminished fourth 4: 2 81/64 407.820 cents Pythagorean major third 5: 8 4/3 498.045 cents perfect fourth 5: 1 10935/8192 499.999 cents fourth + schisma, 5-limit approximation to ET fourth 5: 3 505.214 cents 6: 4 45/32 590.224 cents tritone 6: 1 595.439 cents 6: 1 597.392 cents 6: 1 602.608 cents 6: 1 604.561 cents 6: 4 64/45 609.776 cents 2nd tritone 7: 3 694.786 cents 7: 1 16384/10935 700.001 cents fifth - schisma, 5-limit approximation to ET fifth 7: 8 3/2 701.955 cents perfect fifth 8: 2 128/81 792.180 cents Pythagorean minor sixth 8: 4 405/256 794.134 cents wide augmented fifth 8: 2 799.349 cents 8: 2 806.518 cents 8: 2 8/5 813.686 cents minor sixth 9: 1 5/3 884.359 cents major sixth, BP sixth 9: 2 891.527 cents 9: 2 898.696 cents 9: 3 2048/1215 903.911 cents 9: 4 27/16 905.865 cents Pythagorean major sixth 10: 6 16/9 996.090 cents Pythagorean minor seventh 10: 2 3645/2048 998.044 cents 10: 2 1003.259 cents 10: 2 1010.428 cents 11: 3 15/8 1088.269 cents classic major seventh 11: 2 1095.437 cents 11: 1 1100.653 cents 11: 1 1102.606 cents 11: 4 256/135 1107.821 cents octave - major limma 11: 1 243/128 1109.775 cents Pythagorean major seventh | Number of notes : 12 Smallest interval : 256/243, 90.2250 cents Average interval (divided octave) : 100.000 cents Average / Smallest interval : 1.108340 Largest interval of one step : 16/15, 111.7313 cents Largest / Average interval : 1.117313 Largest / Smallest interval : 1.238363 Least squares average interval : 99.3102 cents Median interval : 98.371 cents Prime limit : 5 Odd number limit : 135 Scale is strictly proper Scale is a well-temperament. It has 3 different sizes of fifth Scale has monotonic third-sizes over circle of fifths Number of different intervals : 52, relative 4.72727 Limited transpositions with margin 14.3375 cents : 2 5 7 9 10 Average distance from equal tempered : 6.9319 cents, 0.069319 steps Standard deviation from equal tempered : 2.3751 cents, 0.023750 steps Maximum distance from equal tempered : 13.6863 cents, 0.136862 steps Geometric average of pitches 0..n: 594.435 cents Arithmetic average of pitches 0..n: 634.647 cents Harmonic average of pitches 0..n: 554.224 cents Geometric average of pitches 1..n: 643.972 cents Arithmetic average of pitches 1..n: 678.367 cents Harmonic average of pitches 1..n: 609.576 cents Geometric average of pitches 1..n-1: 593.424 cents Arithmetic average of pitches 1..n-1: 622.123 cents Harmonic average of pitches 1..n-1: 564.724 cents By the way, the tempering data on a sonority of 16:19:24 might be of interest if one is playing music where a minor third above the lowest note is apt to occur in conclusive sonorities, something that seems to happen around 1500 more often than in later Renaissance/Manneristic music (where closes including a third tend to call for a major third above the lowest voice). This tuning of the division of the fifth into minor third below and major third above can seem more conclusive than the simpler 10:12:15, likely because the lowest note of 16:19:24 is an octave of the acoustical "fundamental" (that is, an even power of 2, here 16). With Elizabethan or Jacobean music, the desire for pure or near-pure major thirds (around 5:4) is likely a more important consideration, with minor thirds at or near 6:5 stylistically appropriate, their "tentativeness" part of the intonational setting. However, I mention that question of 16:19:24 since a tuning might be used in many settings, some of which could favor this kind of sonority. Most appreciatively, Margo Schulter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |