
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Ken Moore wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jerry Kohl > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >This is an extremely interesting observation, and a point I had not > >previously noticed. I just put on two recordings in succession (Frank Llloyd > >and Michael Thompson's), and the note in question is clearly being lipped > >down > > Only very good players would dare: it's so easy to flip to the next note > down in this register! > > >(with some considerable effort) from the 14th partial--which by rights > >ought to be the octave above the seventh, notated as B-flat in the score, > >but sounding almost a quarter-tone flatter (the "septimal seventh"). If > >Britten had wanted to be sure of the 13th partial, however, he might have > >notated A-flat instead of A-natural, since that is slightly closer (in > > Yes, I wish he had chosen Ab or Bb, to avoid the possible confusion. > > >12-equal) to the 13th partial, though extremely sharp of it, and the next > >lower partial is the G. In a just-intoned schema, however, the (notated) A, > >tuned relative to C and/or E, is so much lower than in 12-equal that the > >13th partial is much closer to it than to A-flat. > > > >Can you point me a little more precisely to this Czech recording? I would > >very much like to hear it. > > Sorry, I heard it once, on BBC Radio 3, and can't even remember when. Czech -- could it have been a Naxos? -- Peter T. Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |