
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
John Whelan wrote: > > "TAR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > John Whelan wrote: > > > > > > "TAR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > And, on a personal note, I have heard from others who know him that Dr. > > Lederman is a really nice person. > > Donna, it's not about whether the Doctor is nice or not as > a person, Did I say that it was? I just mentioned it as a personal note. > it about a code of medical ethics they must > follow for George's "emotional" health is as equally > important as "physical" health. I never said that he shouldn't have followed the rules, although I didn't read anywhere that it also specifically means that one can't talk about one's emotional health. He got in trouble by "revealing personally identifiable information" > Lederman should have known > better. I suppose he didn't, and that was his mistake. > He simply did not get permission to discuss this > and that's where he "goofed". And in the course of his > conversation with the press, giving out ones business > phone number like that was the other mistake. That > probably even sunk him even further. I honestly don't think that played a part in any of this. > If I were > looking at it from the viewpoint of Olivia Harrison, I would > be very upset that not only did the doctor not get > permission to discuss the late Beatle's health, but > also took advantage to promote one's own medical > business at the same time. Or maybe she just had a personal problem with him? > Lederman blew it and > that's why he was fined $5,000. Agreed.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |