Re: action: legal liason

I want to build and fly rockets

I acknowledge the need to coordinate with:

- the DoT to insure that risks that can be objectively associated with 
some materials are managed with respect to vehicles, passengers and 
infrastructure (e.g.; fires as a resukt of collisions in tunnels)

- the SFM and county Fire offcials to insure that risks that can be 
objectively associated with some materials are managed with respect to 
innocent people and property

- the FAA, so that low flying aircraft are not startled by what they 
might see

most everything else appears to be a matter of insurability and informed 
consent

- iz

RayDunakin wrote:

> Iz wrote:
> << I gave you the process to determine what an acceptable compromise is while
> simultaneously engaging in the process to achieve it >>
>
> A compromise requires two or more parties to state their desires. What are
> _yours_, in regards to an acceptable level of regulation? Or do you not
> consider yourself a party to that goal?