Re: the New TRA: brainstorming

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 10:04:37 GMT, Ismaeel Abdur-Rasheed
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>responses to off-topic naysaying inline
>
>RayDunakin wrote:
>
>> At what stage is Mr. Wickman's legislative attempt?
>
>what possible utility could there be in revealing any information to a 
>TRA lackey, when TRA has undermined and sabatoged every effort thusfar 

>
>- iz

I don't mean to defend Ray or the TRA.  I'm not even in the
NAR/TRA/Kyte loop.  There may even be something to hang your sabotage
claim on.  I just don't know.  However, sabotage is an ugly
accusation.  The NAR had a plan to free sport rocketry from BATFE
interference by joining forces with TRA in a lawsuit.  A legislative
effort would be made after the legal suit, if or as needed.  It can be
argued that Wickman's legislative attempt sabotaged the NAR/TRA/BATFE
lawsuit that was (or is, if not hopelessly stalled) awaiting summary
judgement.  No judge wants to make a ruling that may be over turned or
nullified by pending legislation.  Finger pointing and wild
accusations get us nowhere.

Alan