
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Todd Christensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > I would say (and it has been my personal expereince) that boxing - > even in it's restricted hand range/ target area - is perfectly suited > for 80% of the self-defense needs for young males of average and above > physical stature. Oh sure; no disagreement there. Hell; *rugby* does that much <g> > Self defense-wise It's not so good for smaller women, frail men or > older people. > But add merely the entry level elements of Judo or Kali or BJJ and > even the smaller folks will be just fine 90% of the time. Yup. Add a weapon and you're statistically even better off. > I say box 2x per week and add one day per week of BJJ, Judo or Kali > and after 2 years you will be able to kick the ass of 80% of the > people out there. If you do three days a week for two years of just about anything martial, you can get into that 80% mark- given that one is reasonably fit. Chas
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |