Re: Responsible shooters & LEO ranges

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 04:59:26 +0000 (UTC), "Ronald Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

#These are the first people to say they should be allowed to hunt, while
#your service rifle is an evil assault weapon, and if it cannot be used
#for hunting two weeks a year, you should not be allowed to have it.  I
#get A LOT of that here.

I have been seeing a lot of it through a number of official channels, not
least in the nominally pro-gun Bush Administration, which refuses to point
out to the American people how the AWB is a stupid law even if you are in
favor of real gun control.

When they finally come for all our guns, one silver lining in it (for me)
will be the howls of indignation from America's noble Bambi-killers,
complaining that we gun rights activists hadn't done enough to protect
their right to shoot up and trash the countryside with their sporting arms.
I am not normally one given to schadenfreude, but that will cause my lips
to curl into a cynical smile.


Mitch



----------------------------------------------------------
Shoot the best, forget the rest! Win your choice of Fulton
Armory prize packages in the 'Classic Military Gas Guns of 
the 20th Century' rifle raffle held by Marylanders for the
Preservation of Firearm Ownership.  Get all the details at
              http://www.direct-action.org  
----------------------------------------------------------
Learn rec.guns at                   http://www.recguns.com
----------------------------------------------------------