
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Eiji Hayashi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Scott H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Despite what I've clearly stated at every possible opportunity, you
still
> > believe this. Sega was *DIFFERENT*, that does not equate to better or
> > worse.
>
> You can keep stating that, but we both know what you really believe is
> Sega is "BETTER" not just "DIFFERENT", and everyone else here knows it
> as well.
No, I would not, and do not state things contradictory to my beliefs.
You, on the other hand, seem very threatened by my web page (
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0zjb2/ ). Despite the fact that the page
states all over it that Sega lost, that the public utterly rejected them,
that Sega consoles rarely got the popular games, that Sega consoles were
comparable in many ways and worth purchasing in their own right, you feel
that the page, and I, somehow state that Sega was always the best.
What I believe is that the public utterly rejected the Sega consoles
because they wouldn't look around before they chose the console they chose.
I do not believe, as you do with the PS2, that any specific Sega console
"deserved to dominate". You see, you're calling me a fanboy, but you're the
only one making ridiculous claims about it being okay that Sony has such a
lead that even Nintendo can't turn a profit anymore. You never saw "the
light" Eiji, you went from being a radical, and stupid, Sega fanboy, to a
radical and stupid Sony fanboy, and that's it. You think that your current
console is greatest, and therefore even the consoles that you used to love
are somehow lessened.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |