Re: Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!

Impmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:29:14 -0800, "Tribaltech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> typed:
> 
> >You are an idiot. With Walmart driving wages downward, in the long run who
> >will have enough money to buy anything? These foolish right-wingers don't
> >seem to realize they are destroying the basis of the American economy.
> 
> The solution is for those dumbass associates to join union.  I'm not
> talking just one department (the entire meat cutter were fired), but the
> whole friggin' store!  If too many walks away when Walmart refuses
> union, there'd be no one left to clean the mess, restock the shelf, and
> exaggrate the falling price.

Oh, geez, this is exactly why people should not join a union.  Why
would anyone want the very people who call them dumbasses to be their
_paid_ representatives? When you go after those who work at wal-Mart
by calling them stupid, brain-washed, and the whole gamut of insults
you put them through for not being unionized, can you blaming them for
not welcoming unions?
 Anyone with an ounce of common sense knows that collective bargaining
just does not work effectively  any more.
Sure unions did a good job when we were concerned about safety and
fair wages, but we don't need unions any more.
> 
> Join the union!  Only then can associates start to see better work
> enviroment, better pay rate, and Walmart not being cheap and competitive
> to drive out local business.

Unions can't promise, nor guarentee any of this. All they can promise
is that you will owe them dues, and that if you ever want to leave the
union, you have a real battle to get them back out again.
 When a union comes in, freedom of speach, except for the shop steward
leaves.
As to Wal-Mart driving out local buisnesses, Wal-Mart can't do that. 
Only customers can make or break a buisness.  Wal-Mart isn't God, you
know.
K