Re: Say NO NO NO to Wal-Mart!!!

"Albert Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 02:26:53 GMT
> "Rich Soyack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Albert Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:08:40 -0500
> > > 127.0.0.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > a union like the ones that destroyed many other US businesses?
> > >
> > > And you can post verification of such a wild statement?
> >
> > How about the number of daily newspapers in New York City.  Go read
> > about what happened to them in the 50s and 60s.
>
> That is a long time ago in city far away.(and not a single link)  This
> is hardly verification of the broad statement you made about "many...US
> businesses."  To make that statement believable you have to show that
> they would have stayed in business except for union interference in
> management decisions.

I see, we can only discuss today and places close to you.  Interesting.  I
always
thought one could learn from history.  Interesting.

>
> After all any business freely contracts for labor.  Where a union is
> involved they freely contract with unionized labor.  I seriously doubt
> that the fault is so one-sided as you would have us believe.

Try looking at the number of cargo ships being off loaded in NYC.  Don't
bother,
those businesses moved across the river to NJ where the labor costs were
cheaper.
Oh, I forgot, only those business within 100 yards of you count.  LOL.

Rich Soyack